Oct 22, 2006, 01:33 AM // 01:33
|
#41
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Europa
|
I hope the x10 step from Tragic to Hated is false information.
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 01:36 AM // 01:36
|
#42
|
Krytan Explorer
|
I'll have almost 200,000 tickets won by the end of the event. If they only have the games twice a year it'll be another 4 years before I max out the titles ><.
Last edited by BoredJoe; Oct 22, 2006 at 02:17 AM // 02:17..
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 01:58 AM // 01:58
|
#43
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: CA
Guild: in it for the trimmmm
Profession: R/
|
I hear from unmentionable sources who heard from unmentionable people that games of chance are guranteed in nightfall. I'm at favored [370k] and unfavored [25k exactly ^^] so I can't wait ;X
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 02:25 AM // 02:25
|
#44
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Guild: Lievs Death Squad [LDS]
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navaros
The "who is to say" part is not very reassuring, especially since every time these things have come around so far, there is a huge player backlash from people who cannot afford the titles who cry foul about the games of chance even existing. Who is to say that eventually Anet won't listen to that player backlash and thus stop offering games of chance before anyone/most people have been able to max their titles.
It would be much more reassuring if there was either an announcement of a confirmed schedule of dates on which these events will occur, or they are made permanent. So that those who already have several hundred thousand plats invested into these titles need not worry about things like the backlashes encouraging the devs to stop offering any games of chance and thus wasting all their money that has already been put into these titles.
|
If its not reassuring enough for you. Don't play the games and stfu. Its that simple.
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 04:36 AM // 04:36
|
#45
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: /wiki user:aro
Guild: DBU
Profession: E/
|
As of right now I'm at: 103153 won and 27636 lost
Been dc'd a few times.
Until there is an active and faster way to get wins and losses we just have to settle for afking. Losing takes a long long time. Mostly due to you getting +1 point lost no matter what game you play. I still say a GW themed pachinko game would be neat...
Now if they made Wisdom and Treasure titles account based I'd be more inclined to get them. That's the main reason I'm working on UnLucky.
[Edit: Kept track for half an hour on Rings of Fortune. 300 tickets won, 98 losses, 60 tickets lost in total.]
Last edited by Lord Aro; Oct 22, 2006 at 08:47 AM // 08:47..
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 09:34 AM // 09:34
|
#46
|
I like yumy food!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where I can eat yumy food
Guild: Dead Alley [dR]
Profession: Mo/R
|
First of all, I believe it only takes 1 millioin tickets to max out the lucky title, as shown by guildwiki. Secondly, there have been different calculations saying that it only takes 12-17 days to max out that title at 1 million tickets (your results would equal 12 days if you divide your number of days by 2.5). The dragon festival I believe was 6 days, the current event is 3 days, so all it takes is one more event for someone to get the max title.
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 11:16 AM // 11:16
|
#47
|
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Guild: Lievs Death Squad [LDS]
|
Its a complete waste of money doing the Nine Rings. After reading that title page on wiki posted last page you max Lucky about 1700 hours before you max Unlucky. Once you've maxed Lucky everything you win afterwards is a complete waste. Unlucky is the longest to max whichever game you stand at, so you might aswell just aim to max that the cheapest way.
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 12:40 PM // 12:40
|
#48
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Milano
|
here we go. a guy reached tier4 in the unluck title and confirmed that max level has been lowered from 500k to 100k. aswell as lucky was lowered from 2.5m to 1milion.
now unlucky makes some sense.
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 12:49 PM // 12:49
|
#49
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: Mo/Me
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guinevere Ac
here we go. a guy reached tier4 in the unluck title and confirmed that max level has been lowered from 500k to 100k. aswell as lucky was lowered from 2.5m to 1milion.
now unlucky makes some sense.
|
Where is that guy and the screenshots of his Tragic title?
Link, please?
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 06:39 PM // 18:39
|
#50
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florida
Guild: One Corgi Army {OCA}
Profession: R/Rt
|
There's a guy in Shing Jea AD1 with the Prosperous (4th Tier) title standing AFK. I'm gonna try to catch him un-AFK and double check if the final tier is now really down to 1 million.
SS:
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 08:11 PM // 20:11
|
#51
|
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: /wiki user:aro
Guild: DBU
Profession: E/
|
On the corner spot next to Pan, also for my above post.
Half hour on Rings of Fortune: 372 tickets won, 102 losses, 12 tickets gained in total.
10 Hour track on Rings of Fortune: 6840 tickets won, 2091 losses, 520 tickets lost in total.
Seems like the pattern is starting to show up. Around 300 ticket wins (bit more), 100 losses, and an unknown net loss of tickets per half hour. Has anyone tracked a few half hours on Nine Rings?
So yeah, don't use Rings of Fortune to work on Lucky, though I'm at tier 2 now mostly from trying to get Unlucky.
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 08:19 PM // 20:19
|
#52
|
Ninja Unveiler
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Louisiana, USA
Guild: Boston Guild[BG]
Profession: W/Me
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Navaros
The "who is to say" part is not very reassuring, especially since every time these things have come around so far, there is a huge player backlash from people who cannot afford the titles who cry foul about the games of chance even existing. Who is to say that eventually Anet won't listen to that player backlash and thus stop offering games of chance before anyone/most people have been able to max their titles.
It would be much more reassuring if there was either an announcement of a confirmed schedule of dates on which these events will occur, or they are made permanent. So that those who already have several hundred thousand plats invested into these titles need not worry about things like the backlashes encouraging the devs to stop offering any games of chance and thus wasting all their money that has already been put into these titles.
|
"The world is ending" again?
What backlash? I haven't seen any backlash.
The chance/lucky titles are 100% optional. The games are filler content to give people a break from the norm. Anyone complaining about this crap is just plain silly.
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 08:53 PM // 20:53
|
#53
|
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Apr 2005
Guild: Deicidal Tendencies
Profession: W/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Aro
So yeah, don't use Rings of Fortune to work on Lucky, though I'm at tier 2 now mostly from trying to get Unlucky.
|
Thats no secret. Statistically speaking to get the closest to an even ratio you have to take a corner on the nine rings.
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 09:17 PM // 21:17
|
#54
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Guild: Shadows of Ravenloft
Profession: E/Me
|
Here's as much guidance as I can offer for the time being...
Golden @ 1M, Tragic @ 50k
|
|
|
Oct 22, 2006, 11:31 PM // 23:31
|
#55
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Apr 2005
Profession: Mo/Me
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omega X
"The world is ending" again?
What backlash? I haven't seen any backlash.
The chance/lucky titles are 100% optional. The games are filler content to give people a break from the norm. Anyone complaining about this crap is just plain silly.
|
There is a backlash in any thread about these titles with tons of comments to the effect of "these titles suck, what a worthless waste of time, don't bring these back, do something new instead, these titles should be removed from the game". Anet has been known to make bad, unnecessary changes to the game based on similar silly backlashes (ie: making Tombs 6v6) so whilst you are correct it is silly for anyone to complain about these titles, that doesn't mean that all their silly complaining might not be listened to and acted upon.
|
|
|
Oct 23, 2006, 02:04 AM // 02:04
|
#56
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Trondheim
Guild: Black Widow
|
Formula
For those of you who aren't just starting out, but would still like to know how much time you should spend on each game to reach a certain number of tickets/losses at the same time, this is the formula used. Nice for checking your progress and how much time is remaining while you stand there as well
Values for the constants A, B, C, and D can be found on wiki, tt and tl depends on what your goal is.
A : Tickets won per hour spent on Nine Rings
B : Tickets won per hour spent on Rings of Fortune
C : Losses per hour on Nine Rings
D : Losses per hour on Rings of Fortune
tt : How many tickets you need
tl : How many losses you need
I used "spreadsheetesque" notation for easy copy-replace in case someone wants to use it.
Hours of Nine Rings needed (HNRN): MAX((D*tt-B*tl)/(D*A-B*C);0) (*)
Hours of Rings of Fortune needed (HRoFN): (tt-A*HNRN)/B
(*) This only checks if HNRN is negative, if you have a case where tt/tl > ~14, HRoFN will become negative, meaning you should spend all time in Nine Rings. (aka. you can't reach both numbers at the same time)
Derived from the functions (do it yourself if you like):
Ax + By = tt
Cx + Dy = tl
|
|
|
Oct 23, 2006, 02:13 PM // 14:13
|
#57
|
Desert Nomad
|
How long can you leave your computer afk? I heard it like kicks you off after 9 hours of idleness.
This true?
|
|
|
Oct 23, 2006, 02:50 PM // 14:50
|
#58
|
Insane & Inhumane
|
well im pretty sure that once the event is over they cant just rip the rings out from under ur feet right? it should be a new build, so what if someone didnt load the new build after and they just kept afking on the rings O.o; just a thought xD.
|
|
|
Oct 23, 2006, 07:41 PM // 19:41
|
#60
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Mar 2006
Profession: W/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guinevere Ac
here we go. a guy reached tier4 in the unluck title and confirmed that max level has been lowered from 500k to 100k. aswell as lucky was lowered from 2.5m to 1milion.
now unlucky makes some sense.
|
I came here to post the same thing, although it appears you beat me to it. I noticed in the titles section of Guildwiki that the max unlucky "Hated" has been dropped to 100,000 losses, which makes more sense. I didn't check who made the change - for all I know it was you :P. I still wish we knew 100% that these were max levels, although this is good news, for sure.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
Unlucky? or Lucky?
|
Rex the Unloving |
Screenshot Exposition |
40 |
Jun 10, 2006 11:20 AM // 11:20 |
Lucky CA
|
briando |
Gladiator's Arena |
2 |
Feb 01, 2006 06:23 AM // 06:23 |
Shusky |
The Riverside Inn |
7 |
Oct 29, 2005 09:05 PM // 21:05 |
lucky drops :>
|
natus |
Screenshot Exposition |
25 |
Sep 27, 2005 09:28 PM // 21:28 |
Me/W : Was I just lucky?
|
VGJustice |
The Campfire |
15 |
Aug 26, 2005 11:12 PM // 23:12 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:51 PM // 13:51.
|